MSNBC Home
Newsvine Home
MSN Home
  • Conversation Tracker
  • Your Column
  • Replies
  • Friends
Type Comments Since You Last CheckedArticle Source Last Checked Stop Tracking All Clear Tracking All
advertisement
{"contentId":"3508231","authorDomain":"msnbc"}

Palin's Book Should Be Called "I'm a Big Whiner"

Sarah Palin's new book called Going Rogue more accurately should be called I'm a Whiner. When Sarah Palin entered the national political arena, she struck me as different, refreshing, and a really out of the box choice on the part of Republican national candidate John McCain. But, Sarah Palin doesn't wear well. In fact, the more you hear, see and, now, read from her, the more you begin to see that- although she likes to project an image of a rough, tough, "take responsibility for yourself " Alaskan- she's just a big complainer who blames everybody else when things go wrong.

In her book, Going Rogue, she blames the McCain staff for not preparing her for a Katie Couric interview- which she botched from A to Z. She said they wouldn't let her be herself, told her how to dress and just didn't get her ready to go one-on-one with Katie.

I went back and looked at the interview again and Sarah Palin made Sarah Palin look bad. Did McCain's staff tell her that when Couric asked her to name a newspaper or periodical she read to go blank and say she couldn't come up with one? Palin looked ridiculous and uninformed- just not curious about the world- and we had legitimate reason to question where she got her information. Whose fault was that? Her's.

She goes on to blame Couric for playing "gotcha" journalism. What is that supposed to mean? All she did was ask questions that Palin couldn't answer. Palin whines that she was kept bottled up from reporters during the campaign. That prevented her from just being herself. I wonder why. The more she was left to her own devices, the more out of it she seemed. Unless Palin communicated in a totally controlled environment, she was terrible on the stump. She whined that her best material in the Couric interview was left on the editing room floor. Really? I don't buy it.

Further, Sarah Palin says that the McCain staff wouldn't let her speak on election night. She writes about having a speech rolled up in her hand, ready to be delivered, only to be denied by McCain's team. Talk about a whiner. She wasn't the presidential candidate; McCain was. Vice presidential candidates don't give concession speeches. Plus, she was told well before election night that she wasn't going to be allowed to give a speech.

She also complains that she was given advice on nutrition by McCain's staff, who had the nerve to talk to her about her appearance. How dare they? Imagine talking to Sarah Palin about the way she looked in public- as if the way she looked in public didn't have virtually everything to do with why she was picked as the vice presidential candidate in the first place. We're talking about the same Sarah Palin who is now on the cover of Newsweek in running attire in some pretty short shorts. Palin is showing a lot of leg. I wonder who she's going to blame for that. She'll probably say someone forced her to wear that outfit.

Maybe it's me, but I'm just not impressed. In fact, I'm bored by Sarah Plain. She loves to present herself as this different kind of politician who goes "rogue". Rogue my butt. Why didn't Sarah Palin just finish her term as governor? With nearly two years left on it, sounds pretty wimpy to me. She's never explained why she really quit, but implies that all the national attention she was getting made it really hard to do her job as governor. Wow. Pretty rogue, huh? Doesn't rogue imply tough and rough? If Sarah Palin couldn't finish her term as governor of Alaska, how is she supposed to be a national leader? Like I said, Palin's book is more aptly named "Sarah Palin: I'm a Big Whiner."

{"contentId":"3508231","authorDomain":"msnbc"}
  • Enjoy this article? Help vote it up the 'Vine.
{"commentId":10709742,"authorDomain":"tang"}
{"commentId":10709742,"threadId":"725831","contentId":"3508231","authorDomain":"tang"}
  • 5 votes
Reply#1 - Mon Nov 16, 2009 6:15 PM EST
{"commentId":10709890,"authorDomain":"theottoshow"}

This is the kind of writing that now qualifies one to be an "MSNBC.COM ANALYST"?

"Rogue my butt"?

"I'm A Big Whiner"?

"I write like a snotty eight year old"? (okay, I added this one)

I love these articles that constantly obsess over Palin while trying to project the image that no one is interested in her. "I'm bored by Sarah Palin" but I'm going to write another boring, tired article telling everyone how bored I am with her, how I liked her until some point when I didn't like her anymore (which in truth was the instant her name was announced by the McCain campaign).

Okay, you fear her immensely. We get it.

Analyst my butt.

{"commentId":10709890,"threadId":"725831","contentId":"3508231","authorDomain":"theottoshow"}
  • 1 vote
Reply#2 - Mon Nov 16, 2009 6:21 PM EST
{"commentId":10713175,"authorDomain":"do0lae"}

Are you kidding me? McCain picked her as his running mate! If we are obsessing over anything, it is the simple mystery of it. I admit that it still astounds me. I'm waiting for substance, some rogueness, and there's never anything there.

It is amazing to me, and I am bewildered that I find myself compelled to leave the Republican party, to stop identifying myself as a Republican.

I don't think anyone is scared at all of Sarah Palin.

I am rightfully, however, scared of any national party that would back her for any serious position of power. It is the same wrong-headed track that James Baker initially started us on with George W. Bush.

Baker's group backed Bush in the crtical and early phases of the formulation of his campaign for the Presidency because they thought, quite frankly, that they would be able to control him. What they learned, in contrast, is that you can't control stupid.

Inadequate candidates can, indeed, be pushed into winning positions by coalitions of various interests individually anticipating narrowly defined payoffs that do not require general competence.

This is what worries me, not that Palin is strong, but that she is thin, weak, undefined, and easily transformable by shadowy figures (like Bill Kristol) with illconceived and unexamined agendas.

{"commentId":10713175,"threadId":"725831","contentId":"3508231","authorDomain":"do0lae"}
  • 4 votes
#2.1 - Mon Nov 16, 2009 8:58 PM EST
{"commentId":10713432,"authorDomain":"Spriggs"}

"Going Vogue" would've been a more appropriate title.

{"commentId":10713432,"threadId":"725831","contentId":"3508231","authorDomain":"Spriggs"}
  • 2 votes
#2.2 - Mon Nov 16, 2009 9:11 PM EST
{"commentId":10735289,"authorDomain":"theottoshow"}
Inadequate candidates can, indeed, be pushed into winning positions by coalitions of various interests individually anticipating narrowly defined payoffs that do not require general competence.

Yes, we're living under it right now.

My reaction to this poor excuse for an MSNBC analyst is his statement that he's bored with Palin and this is the kind of stuff I hear all of time: she's boring, she's irrelevant, she's washed up, she's stupid, she's brainless, she's "inadequate"...yet she is the recipient of the most ruthless and vile attacks of anyone of our time and sorry, even if she doesn't fit the bill, that doesn't make her deserving of that kind of scorn. The mystery isn't that she was picked; she complimented McCain well. The mystery is that for such a non-entity in politics, people are indeed obsessed with tearing her down and making sure she has to claw her way above it.

There are lots of inadequate and irrelevant people in politics or public life. Usually they get ignored or fall to the wayside. The 'fear' is that she's not, that she's actually connecting with masses of voters who aren't snobs and elitists, such as those who show up on these boards, trot out their repetitive complaints about Palin that almost entirely describe the Obama candidacy, and more tragically, the Obama presidency thus far.

She's not topping my list of hopefuls in 2012, but if it means getting rid of this long-running joke currently in the White House, I'll take Palin in 2012. Please.

{"commentId":10735289,"threadId":"725831","contentId":"3508231","authorDomain":"theottoshow"}
  • 1 vote
#2.3 - Tue Nov 17, 2009 6:31 PM EST
{"commentId":10740150,"authorDomain":"do0lae"}

I think Obama is the most generally competent person that we have had in the White House since Richard Nixon. Obama's and, quite frankly, H. Clinton's ability work the phones and press the flesh with world leaders in late modern times rivals only GHW Bush, who was, if you will so kindly recall, the last president to actually win a war since... and it was also in the Middle East. No joke.

{"commentId":10740150,"threadId":"725831","contentId":"3508231","authorDomain":"do0lae"}
    #2.4 - Tue Nov 17, 2009 10:39 PM EST
    {"commentId":10751246,"authorDomain":"theottoshow"}

    Okay, then I'll ask you what I asked Democrat friends of mine: what's his two or three biggest accomplishments so far? Further, were they fulfilling campaign promises or do they fly in the face of his campaign rhetoric? I hear how inexperienced Palin is and virtually everything I predicted about Obama (based on his inexperience) during the campaign and prior to inauguration has come to fruition.

    {"commentId":10751246,"threadId":"725831","contentId":"3508231","authorDomain":"theottoshow"}
      #2.5 - Wed Nov 18, 2009 12:50 PM EST
      {"commentId":10757074,"authorDomain":"do0lae"}

      People who use Democrat as an adjective. . .

      {"commentId":10757074,"threadId":"725831","contentId":"3508231","authorDomain":"do0lae"}
        #2.6 - Wed Nov 18, 2009 4:29 PM EST
        {"commentId":10774477,"authorDomain":"theottoshow"}

        Um,ok...I asked some Democrats.

        Is that better?

        I'll take your response as the standard 'no comment'.

        {"commentId":10774477,"threadId":"725831","contentId":"3508231","authorDomain":"theottoshow"}
          #2.7 - Thu Nov 19, 2009 11:42 AM EST
          Reply
          {"commentId":10714374,"authorDomain":"jewel1944"}

          Sarah Palin is a curiosity without a doubt. I believe that the attraction is seeing if she'll pull one more inconceivable gaff where we can think, "I knew it!" Sarah has become an object of interest because we see her as an unfinished character out of context with the rest of the world. Maybe some people simply don't get manners as Sarah has soundly proved time and time again. The tax-paying voting public needs to see the "after" of an election as well as the initial presentation. With Sarah she unfortunately it seems cannot think beyond her own ambitions and throws caution to the wind by rehashing old wounds and pointing her finger at everyone who has offended her. She felt sorry for Katie Couric and had no problem whatsoever in bashing her. She bashes he daughter's baby's father; she bashes the campaign and doesn't seem to know when diplomacy and tact are in order. How close did we come to having her in the White House and is there a chance she'll go for the win in 2012? Those who shape the president will never be able to rein in Sarah's rouge ambitions. I think she'd be a disaster as a leader simply because she is completely indiscreet.

          {"commentId":10714374,"threadId":"725831","contentId":"3508231","authorDomain":"jewel1944"}
            Reply#3 - Mon Nov 16, 2009 9:57 PM EST
            {"commentId":10729893,"authorDomain":"BlackQueen40"}

            I've known women like her through the years. They are the type who can flirt and fake their way only so far and then everyone sees them for the incompetent people they are. I had to sit back and watch a couple of women I worked with go the same route Palin has gone and one was fired and the other quit when the bosses realized they were good at faking it but there was no substance underneath to back up the pretty package they presented.

            {"commentId":10729893,"threadId":"725831","contentId":"3508231","authorDomain":"BlackQueen40"}
            • 2 votes
            Reply#4 - Tue Nov 17, 2009 3:20 PM EST
            {"commentId":10735110,"authorDomain":"theottoshow"}

            Why does this just apply to women? Why not...Obama? What's the difference? Because he's a man? You basically just described his rise to the presidency.

            {"commentId":10735110,"threadId":"725831","contentId":"3508231","authorDomain":"theottoshow"}
            • 4 votes
            #4.1 - Tue Nov 17, 2009 6:24 PM EST
            {"commentId":10760903,"authorDomain":"usafretvet"}

            Wow, I agree with TOS here. Have any of you heard of Persuasive Public Speaking? Or was that the one class in College you decided you didn't need? Obama has done nothing but make everyone who can't see his fallacies believe he is really going to do something for this country. But there is no evidence of any "change" as of yet. And he is already almost a year in. Are all you Lefty Libs seriously that ignorant.

            {"commentId":10760903,"threadId":"725831","contentId":"3508231","authorDomain":"usafretvet"}
            • 4 votes
            #4.2 - Wed Nov 18, 2009 6:38 PM EST
            {"commentId":10774683,"authorDomain":"theottoshow"}

            That's a good point - where is the 'change'? Where's the transparency, the elimination of lobbyists and special interests and earmarks, the unity and bipartisanship, the tax cuts for 95% of Americans that cannot begin to happen with this kind of growth in government? EVERYTHING about this guy is a sham and embarrassed people who voted for him under the moronic and stupid ruse of 'change' and 'he's not Bush' are starting to figure this out.

            He's making Bush look like a great president.

            {"commentId":10774683,"threadId":"725831","contentId":"3508231","authorDomain":"theottoshow"}
              #4.3 - Thu Nov 19, 2009 11:50 AM EST
              Reply
              {"commentId":10744310,"authorDomain":"iammisfitguy"}

              Sarah Palin is interesting like a comedian is interesting. When we watch a stand up comedian/comedienne, we patiently wait while the individual sets up his/her joke and then, hopefully, are delighted with the punch line. Palin is worth watching simply because the set-ups for her punch lines are as entertaining as the punch line itself.

              She is a liar. There is no doubt about that. Anybody that thinks this person could or should represent their party is delusional. Her grasp of facts are slippery. In fact, I would have to say that she has never seen a fact that particularly interests her. She is outdated. She surely could have gotten away with the fictional views of what she has said in the past if it weren't for video. In a time long ago, she would/could have been effective, but technology simply highlights her lack of ethics. So, even though she is boring or predictable she can be entertaining for moments.

              {"commentId":10744310,"threadId":"725831","contentId":"3508231","authorDomain":"iammisfitguy"}
                Reply#5 - Wed Nov 18, 2009 7:49 AM EST
                {"commentId":10751102,"authorDomain":"paula-6"}

                To "The OttO Show: You cannot compare Palin to the President. Barack Obama is the president of this country because he is intelligent, compassionate, empathetic, and has an honest desire to make this country a better place for all of us to live in. He has studied law and taught it as well. Has Palin?  He can speak with substance, off the cuff, regarding any national or global issue - can Palin?  She has no depth of knowledge in regard to any issues this country faces. She is all style and no substance. She is attractive and charismatic, and seems like she would be a lot of fun to 'pal' around with - but she is not qualified to be a governor, vice-president or president.  

                {"commentId":10751102,"threadId":"725831","contentId":"3508231","authorDomain":"paula-6"}
                  Reply#6 - Wed Nov 18, 2009 12:45 PM EST
                  {"commentId":10751522,"authorDomain":"theottoshow"}

                  That's certainly an opinion. I think he's a fool who's adherence is more to an un-American agenda than to the traditional betterment of this nation, who BTW, was elected entirely based on style over substance. Speaking is certainly his style. But he cannot speak with substance, he cannot speak off the cuff. He fumbles more than Bush when he has to think while he talks. It takes him 60 seconds to spit out 25 seconds of dialogue. Are we both looking at the same guy?

                  He's launched a disastrous economic agenda, attempted destruction of our health care system (counterintuitive to what he campaigned on), the biggest growth of government in virtually all of human history, he's a detached CiC, an American apologist and a radical who surrounds himself with radicals. What has this wonderful president touched that's actually turned to gold? Anything? One thing? His biggest accomplishments were continuing certain Bush policies that he criticized during the campaign.

                  I'll take Palin's limited government 'style and no substance' any day of the week over his. ANYBODY can appear to be doing something when they show NO restraint on government power and spending. But that check's going to be cashed real soon and Mr. Substance is going to style his way out of re-election.

                  You're absolutely right - we cannot compare the rising Palin to Obama the train wreck.

                  {"commentId":10751522,"threadId":"725831","contentId":"3508231","authorDomain":"theottoshow"}
                  • 2 votes
                  #6.1 - Wed Nov 18, 2009 1:01 PM EST
                  {"commentId":10773362,"authorDomain":"paul-davenport"}

                  Wow, I thought it was because he had the lamestream media carrying his water throughout the campaign and the SEIU, Acorn, and the New Black Panthers out steeling the election any way they could.

                  {"commentId":10773362,"threadId":"725831","contentId":"3508231","authorDomain":"paul-davenport"}
                  • 1 vote
                  #6.2 - Thu Nov 19, 2009 10:56 AM EST
                  Reply
                  {"commentId":10773418,"authorDomain":"paul-davenport"}

                  One thing is for sure, the DemocRATS are scared to death of this woman. She is like a wooden stake to a vampire. She could be the end of them and they know it.

                  {"commentId":10773418,"threadId":"725831","contentId":"3508231","authorDomain":"paul-davenport"}
                    Reply#7 - Thu Nov 19, 2009 10:59 AM EST
                    {"commentId":10794389,"authorDomain":"iammisfitguy"}

                    Using the name NemocRATS simply labels you as a name caller. The fact is all of us should be scared to death of this woman and her kool aid drinking supporters as well.

                    {"commentId":10794389,"threadId":"725831","contentId":"3508231","authorDomain":"iammisfitguy"}
                    • 1 vote
                    #7.1 - Fri Nov 20, 2009 8:11 AM EST
                    Reply
                    {"commentId":10794191,"authorDomain":"SuperSaiyan"}

                    Well the fact that this is that same woman who has stated well over a year ago that Hillary Clinton "shouldn't whine about tough media coverage" and is now whining about it herself makes the assessment hard to refute...

                    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nC-tOzXQOsk (Sarah Palin says Hillary Clinton shouldn't whine about tough media coverage)

                    {"commentId":10794191,"threadId":"725831","contentId":"3508231","authorDomain":"SuperSaiyan"}
                      Reply#8 - Fri Nov 20, 2009 7:49 AM EST
                      {"commentId":10794418,"authorDomain":"iammisfitguy"}

                      To the Otto Show. Since you have obviously decided that no matter what our President does or says, you are going to denigrate him, your opinion is worthless in a debate. This is not an opinion. It is how it works in the real world.

                      {"commentId":10794418,"threadId":"725831","contentId":"3508231","authorDomain":"iammisfitguy"}
                      • 1 vote
                      Reply#9 - Fri Nov 20, 2009 8:14 AM EST
                      {"canLink":false,"threadId":"725831","isPrivate":false}
                      Leave a Comment:
                      You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead.
                      As a new user, you may notice a few temporary content restrictions. Click here for more info.
                      {"threadId":"725831","contentId":"3508231"}
                      Start TrackingStart Tracking
                      Stop TrackingStop Tracking
                      About this Group
                      Members: 161
                      Established: 3/2008
                      Group Type: Public
                      To join this group you must be an employee of MSNBC, NBC or an affiliated company or business unit.

                      Follow Steve Adubato, Ph.D. to get e-mail or watchlist alerts whenever new content is published, or subscribe via RSS:

                      RSS
                      msnbc.com's Private Content
                      msnbc.com has not published any private articles, seeds, or discussions that you have access to.